Wednesday, May 12, 2010

Freedom of Expressions Applies to All Sides

A few months ago, I became aware of the political situation in Rwanda and joined a couple of pages on an online social site in hopes of learning more. Undiscriminating, I joined a page named after, and supporting, current Rwandan president Gen. Paul Kagame, and another one for the opposition leader, Ingabire Victoire Umuhoza, leader of the FDU-Inkingi political party based primarily in exile. Through several discussions with other participants, I came to see the passions these people, especially the young men and women, have for what happens in their country. Some even talked about their willingness to pick up arms, should need arise, and fight for what they perceive to be their way of right.

I agreed with some, and I disagreed with others, without taking any one side besides the truthful side, but all in all I was impressed. Over time, some participants began to change their views towards the middle; their shift from radical beliefs to more conciliatory ones reflecting a sense of maturity that a country like Rwanda needs in order to move on from the wounds of the past.

One of the topics we tackled was that of freedom of expression...the ability to speak your mind and bring your ideas to the table without fear of persecution. In Rwanda, two tabloids were first suspended, then outrightly outlawed because of their criticism of the government; the president mentioned journalists' meeting of exiled former military leaders whom it accuses of terrorism and some took this to be a warning against them; There is talk of imprisonment and harassment of journalists with some going in hiding or exile; and Rwanda has been listed as one of the states where freedom of press is heavily hampered by authorities.

Our discussions varied with some supporting the government and others accusing it of heavy-handedness and authoritarianism. But, one thing that became apparent was that censuring of who said what and what they said was wrong. Several outspoken supporters of the current regime were banned from the Ingabire page, and they complained about in as much as supporters of the two tabloids did when the government announced their suspension.

A number of supporters of Ingabire cried afoul of the banishment of anyone from the group when all they are accused of is speaking their mind. Around that time, I paused a question on April 18, 2010 on Ingabire's group page asking whether that page was managed by her or someone delegated by her to that duty. My question was not answered but I was encouraged to ask whatever question I had in the discussions section. I posted my question that same day and it went as such:

"What is Ingabire and the FDU-Inkingi doing to reach out to those who might feel threatened by her ethnicity and what is perceived to be her views?"

Up to this day, no one has answered my question. I even sent an email to an FDU-Inkingi asking that same question and no one has replied yet. I understand times have been tough with her arrest and arraignment on extremely serious charges, but we, as ordinary Rwandans, also have questions that, if answered, can help us cement our support for her. However, beyond just standing up to the RPF-government, she has to show that she will not replace one form of system for a similar system just for change's sake.
Which brings me to another of my questions: If Ingabire, or her supporters, is intolerant of other's freedom to express their views, what makes us think she, or they, will not do so once in power in Kigali?

If the group is not affiliated with her, her representatives should be wary of someone turning potential supporters into critics.  To those who feel threatened and who feel they have sufficient reason to feel that way, this type of action only adds to their suspicion and mistrust. If we accuse the Kigali government of oppression, we have to make sure we are not committing the same offenses we are accusing it of. Otherwise, it's the proverbial name-calling between the pot and the kettle.

I call that those banned from the group for voicing their views be allowed back in and encouraged to debate in order to reach a middle ground that is beneficial to Rwanda in general without alienating some among our midst, no matter how different and infuriating their views might be. The exception, of course, is if their speech is illegal and exhibits threats against others.

The only way to live together as Rwandans is through dialog. We talk, we listen, we clarify our views, and we empathize. We become better, tolerant, and insightful Rwandans for the benefit of our future and our children's after us. Muze dukore, dusigire abana bacu umurage ababyeyi bacu badusigiye.



4 comments:

  1. Great Piece!
    I really liked it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The link below is for your response, Mr Sakabaka: http://www.facebook.com/notes/victoire-ingabire-umuhoza-for-president/the-victoire-ingabire-umuhoza-for-president-facebook-page-disclaimer/328737928422

    The disclaimer note states that "Unless otherwise expressly indicated, The Victoire Ingabire Umuhoza and her Party UDF do not endorse, nor are responsible for any of the postings, comments, opinions or other submissions ("User Submissions") on this Facebook page and expressly disclaims any and all liability in connection with User Submissions."

    The Facebook page team goes on to say that "Comments, discussion posts, wall posts and any other user posted content that is deemed inappropriate by the team will be removed from the page. If in the team’s judgment an individual continually posts inappropriate material, the team may exercise its right to block that individual from posting content on the Page."

    So please read carefully the disclaimer note and stop judging Victoire Ingabire Umuhoza by someone else's actions.

    At first inappropriate comments that shows no consideration to others, (insulting, made to irritate or abusive) are removed and their authors are given warnings. If the author continues to ignore warnings with same kind of comments and postings, they are banned.

    This is about responsibility and order. The facebook page is a place for constructive debate not for vandalism. It is as simple as that.

    Facebook page is open for others to discuss what the want. No one is under obligation to answer every question posted. Your question was no different from others nor are you from other fans on the page. If fans did not answer to your question, it was not Victoire's or one else's fault.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thank you, Nink, I try to be as objective as I can.

    VIU Admin, thank you for clarifying that. That is why I had asked my previous question about whether she was affiliated with the page, and I only asked it there because I was encouraged to post it there by others. However, I also sent an email to FDU through their website and I have yet to get a response. If it's because they're understaffed, I understand but they should ask for volunteers to make sure people's concerns are addressed.
    Also, if I supported a candidate and I knew that someone was on the fence about supporting them, I would do all I can to bring them over to my side. But, if you don't think you need anyone else besides those you already have supporting her, then I understand.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Also, here's a response I gave to someone on this topic:
    " I believe there is a better strategy of dealing with dissenters and those that seek to create chaos out of whatever situation they feel threatened by.
    Firstly, it's an opportunity to hone skills in dealing with such people. If someone comes saying that I'm a genocide denier, I will ask the person where he/she got that idea from, explain my position, and refute any evidence they offer up. If it becomes apparent that the person is doing it to irritate me and waste my time, I will reiterate my position and leave it at that. Such people's maturity and intention becomes apparent to others, and in time they lose their self-perceived importance.
    Secondly, it teaches us to be tolerant. If you can retain your cool as someone is screaming insults in your face, others around you notice your calm and are inspired by you. You learn to work around their insults and still accomplish your mission because those insults are not the driving force behind your actions. Your will and determination are what should be driving you forward.
    Thirdly, it's an opportunity for the opposition to distinguish itself from the actions of the regime. Umuseso and Umuvugizi were accused of calling Kagame names and other such charges. The banned people on Ingabire's group are accused of insulting her, and to me the two sides are the same. In order to show that you are different, you have to do things differently even in small instances, such as Facebook. If the page is not by Ingabire or her representatives (which I think it's not) then FDU-Inkingi should stand up and make it known. They did so previously:::

    "ITANGAZO RIGENEWE GUKWIRAKWIZWA HOSE
    Kubiyise cercle des amis de Victoire Ingabire CAVIRWANDA
    Mw'izina ry'ishyaka FDU-Inkingi na Prezida wayo Victoire Ingabire Umuhoza turabamenyesha ko mudafite uburenganzira bwo kwiyitirira ko muli inshuti za Prezida wacu Victoire Ingabire Umuhoza mutabiherewe uruhusa, kandi ali we, ali natwe tutabazi. Bikongeraho ko ibitekerezo mushyira ku mbuga bidahuye na gato n'imitekerereze ya Prezida wacu n'ishyaka ayobora. Mufite uburenganzira bwuzuye bwo kugira ibitekerezo byanyu muharanira aliko ntimufite uburenganzira na buto bwo gukoresha izina rye, atabizi, ishyaka rye ritabizi kandi ritanemera ibitekerezo byanyu mumwitirira, muvuga ko muli inshuti ze. Tubasabye rero guhindura inyito yanyu.
    Tubaye tubashimiye.
    Nkiko Nsengimana
    Visi-Prezida
    Umuhuzabikorwa wa komite
    FDU-Inkingi "

    This is an opportunity that, I believe, shouldn't be overlooked to highlight the differences between the government and the FDU. Remember the proverb that igiti kigororwa cyicyiri gito...this is the moment to make sure that what is right needs to be done right from the very beginning...the ends don't necessarily justify the means in this case."

    ReplyDelete